What do you think of the recent open letter to McDonald’s CEO Jim Skinner, asking to retire Ronald MacDonald, on the grounds that McDonalds’ child-targeted marketing of unhealthy foods is partly responsible for today’s obesity epidemic?
A step in the right direction or barking up the wrong tree?
Here’s an excerpt:
We know the contributors to today’s epidemic are manifold and a broad societal response is required. But marketing can no longer be ignored as a significant part of this massive problem.
We ask that you heed our concern and retire your marketing promotions for food high in salt, fat, sugar, and calories to children, whatever form they take – from Ronald McDonald to toy giveaways. Our children and health care system will benefit from your leadership on this issue.
But should McDonald’s really be carrying the brunt of this burden? The issue of child-targeted advertising is far reaching and quickly becoming more and more complicated in this day and age. For more information on this issue, an April article from the New York Times gives interesting background. Compared to some of the deceptive ad campaigns mentioned in the article, disguised as online games (eg: Honey Nut Cheerios Comic Strip Creation) and social media, old Ronny seems positively wholesome to me.